Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter04.txt

Internet Message Format | 1996-07-07 | 40KB

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is September 12, 1975, and
this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 4.

As usual, there is a great deal more going on right now than meets the
eye. The major media mislead the American people daily simply by
presenting only those portions of the truth about events that add up
to produce a desired impression. Thus you can't hope to grasp the true
significance of news events unless and until you learn to analyze the
scanty facts in the news for yourself. Learn to separate fact from
opinion. You are not given enough real facts to come to your own
clear-cut, logical decisions except perhaps in the area of sports.
Instead, the gaps are filled in for you by commentary designed to lead
you to conclusions that are not really your own. This is why I am
trying to open your eyes to the way things really work and to give you
key information that you need to have.

To this end, I want to discuss the following three topics today:

Topic #1--THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND "GOLD SALE AGREEMENT" AND
THE DETHRONING OF THE UNITED STATES DOLLAR

Topic #2--ASSASSINATION POLITICS AND SUBTLE MANEUVERINGS IN THE
COUNTDOWN TOWARD DICTATORSHIP

Topic #3--THE RAPIDLY MERGING OUTLINES OF THE PLANNED 1977 WAR IN
ASIA.

At the end I also hope to mention some brief hints about what you, the
individual concerned American, can do to help stem the tide and save
our beloved land.

Topic #1--In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 2 for July 1975 I discussed
the setback which David Rockefeller experienced at the June meeting of
the "International Monetary Fund", or IMF. Speaking through his agents
in the United States Treasury, he had expected to succeed in
persuading the member nations of the IMF to sell all of the IMF gold,
and was ready to buy the IMF gold as soon as it was sold. Much to
David's surprise and chagrin he failed in June 1975 because of French
opposition based on their own awareness of the true status of Fort
Knox and America's gold reserves. As I mentioned in that AUDIO LETTER,
the Rockefeller interests went to work in a feverish search for a
means of achieving their objective--that is, a decision to sell IMF
gold at the next IMF meeting in September, this month. And if you paid
any attention to the news early this month, you know that this time
the Rockefellers did achieve a hasty compromise agreement. In a moment
I will explain exactly what was decided about potential gold sales at
the early September meeting of the IMF, but first I want you to notice
the startling quid pro quo which the Treasury accepted on behalf of
David Rockefeller as the price of selling the IMF gold.

For years now the United States Treasury has been debunking the
monetary role of gold as obsolete, barbaric, and no longer needed. In
this connection, the Treasury has been fighting for years to bar
Central Banks from buying gold on the free market. The reason for this
is to allow the interests controlled by David Rockefeller to corner
the gold for themselves while their deliberately-produced runaway
inflation ruins the rest of us stuck with paper money that has no
backing. But at the September 1975 IMF meeting this position which the
United States has stuck to uncompromisingly for years was suddenly
abandoned. Why? What was it that made the United States agree to let
Central Banks buy gold? They already had the right to sell it. What
caused such a total defeat for David Rockefeller and such a dramatic
reversal of a fundamental policy built up now for years?

My friends, what caused the result is the spreading effect of our
exposure of the Fort Knox Gold Scandal. The general American public
still doesn't know about it, thanks to the news blackout imposed by
CBS, ABC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles
Times, and other major media which are controlled and intimidated by
the Rockefeller Brothers themselves. But the most knowledgeable people
in the financial community here and abroad increasingly do know that
something is very fishy indeed about the United States Treasury
Department. In short, the heat is on!

Since we revealed the existence of the Central Core Vault in July and
explained its role in the gold theft and fraud at Fort Knox, the
Treasury knows that we know exactly what they have been doing, and
how. The Conspirators know that if my associates and I ever are
allowed to present our evidence in a court of law before a grand jury
or in a Congressional investigation, their fate is sealed. Their game,
therefore, is to try to keep that from happening by keeping the public
fooled and unaware of the truth. To this end, the Rockefellers made
their big concession at the September IMF meeting in order to get some
IMF gold returned to the Treasury.

Under the terms of the Agreement, five-million ounces of IMF gold is
to be returned to the United States, from whence it came. This gold
was originally promised for sale to the "insiders" within the
Rockefeller circle, but now they wanted instead to display or use it
in gold auctions to keep the public fooled. In this connection, on
August 21, 1975, shortly before the latest IMF meeting, the Treasury
even held a well-publicized meeting with private gold dealers to
discuss the question of holding auctions. This was pure propaganda and
bluff, and intended to lend weight to any future auctions of gold
obtained from the IMF. The frantic maneuverings to snatch some IMF
gold for propaganda auctions is simply a replay of what they did last
December to have a little gold to auction off. On December 9, 1974,
the Treasury illegally emptied the tiny "Exchange Stabilization Fund"
of its two-million ounces of gold, as I have mentioned in previous
tapes. That was done simply to have something for the Treasury to sell
in small propaganda auctions, since the rest of our gold reserves were
long gone.

With this important perspective in mind, listen please to what the IMF
did on August 31, 1975, at the beginning of their so-called September
meeting:

No. 1--The widely publicized "Gold Sale Agreement" of the IMF is an
agreement in principle, a conditional agreement. The IMF is to meet
again in January 1976 in Jamaica to discuss the Exchange Rate
question. If, and only if IMF members agree on that in January, then
the conditional Gold Sale Agreement, which has just been announced,
will take effect. The stakes are so high for David Rockefeller and his
partners in crime that I predict agreement will be reached at the
January meeting in Jamaica. The political will is there. The IMF gold
will then be officially released, although I am informed that steps
are already being taken now behind the scenes, illegally and
prematurely, to take possession of the five-million ounces of gold and
put it back in Fort Knox.

By the way, there have been rumors lately that Mrs. Mary Brooks, the
Director of the United States Mint, has tendered her resignation, but
that it has not yet been accepted because it would look so bad. There
are indications that her superior said, in effect, quote: "Just hang
on for a few more months, Mary, while we get this whole thing about
Fort Knox out of the way. Then you can go, if you like." Be that as it
may, we had one of our sources contact Mrs. Brooks, and here is what
she said, quote: "There is nothing amiss at Fort Knox. I was there
recently. I have never tendered my resignation, and I don't intend to
do so. I don't know why these rumors keep coming up." Asked if she
knew about the rapid retrieval elevator system to the Central Core
Vault, she did not deny it but just replied, quote: "Those kind of
rumors come along all the time." Our source suggested to Mrs. Brooks
that it would be a simple matter to open Fort Knox wide open to prove
Dr. Beter wrong and, quote: "put an end to this matter once and for
all." Her reply--and this is her exact reply--and I quote: "Oh, no! It
would take weeks." All I can say to that, my friends, is: "Yes, Mary,
it will take weeks to get the five-million ounces of gold back in Fort
Knox." That is why I am informed there is some activity going on right
now in Fort Knox. Meanwhile Mary Brooks is trying to brazen it out.

Returning to the IMF Gold Sale Agreement tho ugh, I should point out
one other thing: Should there fail to be an agreement about Exchange
Rates by the IMF in January in Jamaica, an unlikely event, than we
will be back to Square One on IMF gold sales. Should that happen,
David Rockefeller and his fellow "insiders" will have used the IMF
gold sales decision as a scare tactic throughout this fall of 1975 to
run down gold prices and take all the gold they can out of weak hands.
Also, they made billions of dollars going "short." When the public
becomes aware of this, gold prices will start up again.

No. 2--The interim or conditional Gold Sale Agreement specifies the
following:

Of the approximately 150-million ounces of gold now owned by the IMF,
one-sixth or 25-million ounces is to be sold on the open market or to
member Central Banks. The latter is what will actually occur. True to
Rockefeller tradition, by the way, this IMF gold sale to suit their
own purposes has been painted as a philanthropic move to raise money
to aid poor and developing nations.

Another one-sixth or 25-million ounces is to be returned to member
nations of the IMF in proportion to the amounts of gold each nation
originally contributed. Each nation may then keep or sell this
returned gold, but you can bet they will keep it. Their own citizens
will hang their Central Bankers if they don't.

Under this clause the United States is to receive about five-million
ounces worth about $700,000,000 at current market prices. This amount,
I am informed, has already been promised to the "insiders", but events
may undo this when the Fort Knox Gold Scandal breaks nationally and
world-wide. It is this five-million ounces of gold, equal to only
about two percent (2%) of what the United States Treasury officially
claims to have, that the Conspirators want desperately to get their
hands on in case they need it for propaganda auctions or even another
carefully-staged "peep show" at Fort Knox.

The remaining two-thirds of the IMF gold, or about 100,000,000 ounces,
is to "stay put" in the IMF for the time being. There it will remain
as backing for the so-called "Special Drawing Rights", or SDR's, of
the IMF. The SDR is to become the new international monetary unit or
standard of measure, the yardstick; and then the other strong
currencies that now make up part of the basket of the 16 currencies
which constitute the SDR's, will be the reserve currencies of the
future, at least for the next two years. The dollar, therefore, is
giving up its sovereignty as a sole reserve currency. The joker in
this deck is that over half of an SDR is made up of the American
dollar and British pound sterling, both of which lack gold backing. In
the tremendous inflation ahead, the SDR will therefore be hobbling
around on one leg with its only real support consisting of the strong
gold-backed currencies which comprise less than half its face value.

No. 3--and very important. Beginning January 1976 the IMF members have
agreed not, repeat NOT, to affix an official gold price for a period
of two years, provided the January 1976 agreement on Exchange Rates
takes place. This is exactly the development I have been warning about
for over a year, based on information from my own confidential
sources. They are behind schedule in obtaining this agreement, but the
agreement itself is precisely on track. Once it is in place, they can
easily make up for lost time in their plan to visit economic
catastrophe on the United States and the world.

What the IMF agreed to in principle is to allow its members, including
the United States, to ask their respective governments to abolish the
official price of gold, which is now $42.22 an ounce, once the
Exchange Rate agreement is reached in January 1976. This means that
for the following two years there will be only a "market price" for
gold, subject only to supply and demand plus massive massages by the
Rockefeller interests to cause the price of gold to skyrocket. In
other words, gold will be going private for two years starting in
January 1976. The gold zoom signal of $180 an ounce, which I explained
in my AUDIO BOOK recorded in October 1974, will be penetrated and
cataclysmic inflation and economic chaos will erupt. After two years
of this, with the economy of the world and especially of the United
States in smoking ruins, David Rockefeller--the man who orchestrated
the whole thing in the first place--presently plans to call an
"International Monetary Conference" to at last restore gold to its
traditional monetary role. David's plan is to officially repeg gold
then at $2,000 an ounce--twenty times the current official price of
$42.22 an ounce!

No. 4--After the two-year period just mentioned, according to the Gold
Sale Agreement just reached by the IMF, Central Banks will be allowed
to buy all the gold they want. As I have already pointed out, this
complete reversal of a key feature of the Treasury's long standing
gold-debunking campaign is directly traceable to the steadily building
pressure of the Fort Knox Gold Scandal and the desperate need of the
Conspirators to keep it covered up.

No. 5--Until January 1976 no sales of gold will be made by the IMF to
world gold markets or to Central Banks at market prices. It would not
yet be legal to do so, but I fully expect that agreement will be
reached at Jamaica in January, and that IMF gold sales will then take
place according to plans. Thus the United States dollar is now way
over-valued.

The United States Treasury is most anxious to get its house back in
order, in appearance at least, to prevent the public from becoming
aware that Fort Knox is truly empty of its gold. The Treasury now
holds less than 800,000 ounces of gold--a mere pittance left over from
the 2,000,000 ounces it illegally took from the Exchange Stabilization
Fund on December 9, 1974. The rest was used for the propaganda
auctions by the Treasury in January and June of this year.

Gold fever will spread across the land in the near future as soon as
the full significance of the IMF action is widely understood, and then
the only questions will be not the price but the availability of gold.
The gold market today is very thin as it is, and the "insiders" had to
scare the weak sisters in order to make them disgorge their holdings.

As of now, David Rockefeller still plans for gold to be pegged at
$2,000 an ounce, and for the new SDR's to be the standard unit of
measure. The United States dollar will lose its status as a world
currency reserve. Even now David Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan Bank is
already linking some of its loans to SDR's. After all, who should know
better than David that dollars are to be avoided?

For the next two years after January 1976, those countries having gold
in their Central Banks will be able to enjoy a fast markup in the
value of their gold reserves of 20 to 1. Can you imagine!--20 to 1.
Therefore during that period, Central Banks will buy up at market
prices the 25,000,000 ounces that will be for sale by the IMF. That
gold will never reach the private gold market at all. But the United
States has been deliberately made gold poor by the Rockefeller
Brothers.

Having no gold left of any significance, we are now in the same leaky
boat as Britain. And look what is happening to Britain, which is
already on the road to advanced socialism! Cataclysmic inflation,
deepening unemployment, and social and economic upheaval on the way to
dictatorship are in store for all of us soon if the gold situation is
not rectified. And so, my friends, we are in a race against time.
David Rockefeller and his collaborators in and out of the Treasury
seek delay, delay, delay. They want to use the IMF gold and other
tricks to keep the American people fooled  until it is too late. Time,
unfortunately, is on their side. Those of us who would like to see our
nation saved, on the other hand, are pressing with every means at our
disposal for a full, open, honest INVESTIGATION of the whole thing
without further delay.

In this connection, Iwant to read some telling words from the front
page of the Daily News Digest for the week of September 1, 1975.
(Their address, by the way, is: P. O. Box 27496, Phoenix, Arizona
85061 .) The headline is just one word: "WHY?" I now quote:

"The Fort Knox gold story is far from dead. There is something rotten,
and the stink has spread across the land like a fog. Thousands of
readers have followed our series closely. Like them, we have waited in
vain for satisfactory answers to questions raised by Dr. Peter David
Beter and his associate, Ed Durell. An exchange of letters with the
United States Bureau of the Mint has produced nothing but double talk.

The key question regarding the Central Core Vault still remains a
mystery. Is the gold there or isn't it?

Why is it so difficult to send a delegation to Fort Knox, open the
Vault and reveal its content--or lack of content? Why have no members
of Congress taken it upon themselves to settle this matter? Is courage
such a missing virtue in Washington that this can't be or won't be
done?!

Why has the nation's press avoided the story with an intensity that is
amazing? Is this not perhaps the biggest news story in the civilized
history of the world? It certainly has that possibility. An evil group
of individuals that can loot a nation's Treasury, as has been charged,
to the tune of $11,000,000,000 certainly deserves some attention,
doesn't it?

And the radio and TV industry didn't even mention the initial charges,
and covered only the "peep show" staged at Fort Knox last September.

But the newspapers, where are they? Why the blackout on the Fort Knox
story? Is there some powerful force that scares them into submission?
Or would they lose so much advertising that they can't run the story?
Or do the major editors think the story is so outrageous as to merit
no attention? Outrageousness certainly didn't prevent Jane Fonda and
others from getting front-page coverage!

Yes, something stinks. IS THE GOLD THERE OR ISN'T IT? Which of our
Congressmen has the guts to find out?"

Finally, here is an item for you to think about if you are tempted to
swallow the Rockefeller propaganda about the swaggering economic power
of the Arabs and oil-producing states:

On September 5, 1975, a reporter posed the following question to Dr.
Abdul-Rahman Al-Atteqi, Minister of Finance of Kuwait, at the National
Press Club, quote: "None of the oil-producing states spoke during the
World Bank and IMF meetings. Why not?"

Dr. Al-Atteqi answered, quote:

"Addressing people seems to be of no meaning. If the United Nations or
World Bank meetings had a time to listen exactly as good listeners
should, everyone would speak, but most of the speeches just go into
the air. Nobody hears it--whispering, most of the delegates out of the
room--and then it is a text in a book. If it happens, sometimes
somebody reads it. This is why. And secondly, it is known who runs the
policy of the Monetary System of the world, and we cannot for the time
being compete with them. We are in their hands. So this is a fact. We
have to live with it unless we break through--and we are looking for
that time."

His answer met with knowing applause. It expresses not only the
predicament of the oil-producing nations: it expresses yours and mine
as well.

Topic #2--On September 5, 1975, in Sacramento, California, a dress
rehearsal was held for the assassination of our figurehead president,
Gerald Ford. A young woman named Lynette Fromme got to within two feet
of the President before being stopped by a Secret Service agent. As
she was bundled off by the Secret Service with a look of horrified
surprise on her face, she reportedly shouted: "It didn't go off!"

The very next day the news media were filled with the entirely
predictable conclusion of officials connected with the case. Miss
Fromme, they assured us, had acted alone. The possibility of a
conspiracy--that "dirty word"--was quickly pooh-poohed and discounted.
True, she had been given the gun by someone else, but that couldn't
mean anything. And, yes, her landlady did reportedly say that just
lately Miss Fromme had suddenly started paying her rent with $100
bills, but that can't be anything but coincidence. To give due credit
to the officials involved though, it should be mentioned that some of
them did become predictably excited about one thing--namely, the
often-stated need to disarm the populace under the banner of "gun
control." One official even ranted that this is so acute and so
immediate as to call for, quote: "wartime measures."

Well, everybody, it so happens that the incident on September 5 was
not intended to injure President Ford. On July 17 and 18, 1975, I said
in a speech at the Santa Monica Civic Center in California, and I
quote: "By September 1975 we will know if Rockefeller is to be
stopped. Some very important developments are in the making." By this
I was referring to the all-out power struggle that is now going on out
of the public view, and the potentially decisive importance of this
month, September 1975, in the Rockefeller timetable for Dictatorship
in America. This power struggle, though it is well hidden from the
general public, is escalating to the vicious level of assassination
politics which burst onto the American scene twelve years ago with the
murder of President John F. Kennedy. Assassinations have been a
recurring part of the American scene ever since, including those of
Dr. Martin Luther King, Robert F. Kennedy, and recently Jimmy Hoffa,
among others. And this volcano of violence threatens to erupt yet
again, now, as rival factions within and close to the Rockefeller camp
jockey for position in the Dictatorship now forming.

Last month, by the way, in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 3 I revealed for
the first time the truth about how and why President Kennedy was
killed. The response to my comments on that subject has been so
overwhelming that I believe the following footnote is worth mentioning
here.

As you will recall, I revealed last month that President Kennedy was
riding in an elaborately-rigged limousine--the murder car. He was
killed not by a sniper but by a well-aimed blast from inside the car.
That blast was in all probability set off by a radio signal from
outside the car by someone in a position to tell just when to do it.
My confidential technical sources now believe they know where the
radio signal came from.

If you have followed the various accounts that have come out about the
J.F.K. assassination over the years, you have probably heard of the
mysterious man with the umbrella. This was an onlooker who was right
on the scene of the shooting in Dallas. Reportedly he abruptly raised
his umbrella and opened it just as the President's car went by, and at
that moment the several snipers all began firing. After a few seconds,
he is said to have closed the umbrella and put it back down, and the
firing stopped. He then melted into the crowd and quickly vanished.
Others have theorized that the man with the umbrella was the signal
man who used the umbrella to coordinate the firing of the snipers for
maximum confusion and effect. I believe this is correct, but based on
my own confidential information, I believe he also had the additional
role of sending the radio signal to set off the fatal blast inside the
murder car at the height of the din from the snipers. The upraised
umbrella would have made a perfect radio antenna to transmit the
signal, and the signal itself could have been triggered with a button
on the umbrella handle. It was important though to avoid focusing
suspicion on the murder car itself, which was destroyed within 48
hours. Therefore an ordinary umbrella looking like the one used by the
mysterious onlooker, was no doubt left somewhere nearby for people to
find, while the real umbrella equipped by the CIA with a tiny radio
transmitter, was spirited away. When the ordinary look-alike umbrella
was found discarded on the scene, the natural reaction would be to
say, "Look here. I guess the guy with the umbrella got rid of it so it
wouldn't hamper his get away." And that would be that.

At any rate, we stand on a threshold of a possible new era of
assassination, intimidation, and misinformation of the public even
worse than that which followed the Kennedy assassination. The
September 5 dress rehearsal for Ford's assassination was for two
purpose s. First, it was to give him a not-so-subtle hint that he had
better fulfill his deal with Nelson Rockefeller and vacate the White
House soon - or else. Second, it was staged on camera, you will
notice, for the benefit of you and me--the public.

This incident is a part of a multi-faceted campaign to condition your
mind to accept the departure of the Fords from the public scene one
way or another. Witness, for example, how CBS, which is thoroughly
under the thumb of the Rockefellers, set up Betty Ford as a clay
pigeon on the August 10, 1975, CBS television show "60 MINUTES." There
Betty Ford bared her private life and thoughts in public in a way
which has brought down ridicule and shame on her head. In this and
many other ways, the Fords are being belittled in the public mind, so
that our first appointed President won't be missed when he is replaced
by our second.

Yes, the behind-the-scenes power struggle which has so far kept Nelson
Rockefeller from seizing the presidency which he had planned to do by
June, three months ago, is beginning to erupt into the open. What we
are witnessing is the latest phase of an elaborate multistepped coup
d'etat with its major milestones spaced roughly a year apart so that
public apprehensions will largely die out between steps.

Just over three years ago the coup d'etat began with the Watergate
break-in. Two years ago Vice-President Spiro Agnew was eliminated from
the scene. This activated the 25th Amendment, which Nelson Rockefeller
had manipulated into the Constitution several years before to be used
in the planned coup. Just over one year ago Richard Nixon became the
first President in American history to resign--the victim of
Watergate, which was conceived by Nelson Rockefeller, engineered by
his CIA, and given a final assist in the form of blackmail by Nelson
Rockefeller's long-time agent, Henry Kissinger. Now it has been
another year and it is time for the next step--namely the ousting of
figurehead Gerald Ford from the White House so that our
president-in-fact, Nelson Rockefeller, can make himself President in
name also. And Rockefeller must do this soon because he is becoming
more and more unpopular by the day. If this is accomplished according
to plan, the coup d'etat itself will be complete.

After that, there will only be one step left to go--our ratification
of Nelson Rockefeller's status as our DICTATOR on election day
November 1976, just over one year from now. On that day we are to
return our then incumbent president, Nelson Rockefeller, to the White
House and at the same time we are to accept, by national referendum,
the new Rockefeller Constitution--which has already been written and
which will give him a nine-year term as our first Dictator. Every
possible avenue is being pursued in order to pave the way for this
bicentennial death of our Republic! Not the least of these
preparations involve the conditioning of your mind through the massive
controls over the mass media exercised by the Rockefellers. For
example, various component provisions embodied in the secret "NEW
CONSTITUTION" keep popping up here and there, seemingly at random but
actually as parts of a well coordinated master public relations war
being waged on the unsuspecting American public by the Rockefellers.

To cite just one example--and they are everywhere these days if your
eyes are open--there is the article in a recent issue of Business Week
entitled, quote: "The big new push for federal chartering of
corporations." Business Week, it should be mentioned, is published by
McGraw-Hill, one of the hundreds of major companies under Rockefeller
control. McGraw-Hill is a particularly useful voice for the
Rockefellers, since it publishes a series of special industry
magazines which established high prestige long ago and are therefore
very influential now. Anyway, the article says that there is a rapidly
emerging push to replace State chartering of corporations in America
by federal chartering, and that surprisingly some of the most powerful
backing for this move is coming from leaders of major corporations
themselves, such as General Electric. The article fails to point out
though that all of these big corporations cited are Rockefeller
outfits, and federal chartering is one of the keystones of the
corporate-socialist economic structure spelled out in the new
Rockefeller Constitution. The impetus for this big new federal
chartering campaign is stated to be a couple of Supreme Court
decisions which may look (quote) "conservative" on their face since
they effectively removed the federal influence over corporations that
had long been exerted through Rule 10-B (5) of the Securities Exchange
Commission. This ruling looks, at first glance, to be a move away from
federal meddling, but its actual purpose is to whip up sentiment in
Congress to pass legislation which will go much further than the old
SEC rule.

This is a perfect example in which the real purposes of political
actions are the exact opposite of the surface appearance. And if
anyone doubts that the Supreme Court is knowingly being guided to do
the Rockefeller will, just consider, for example, our Chief Justice
Warren Earl Burger. One of the ways in which he established the
credentials which led to his Supreme Court appointment, was through
his contribution as a so-called "outside expert" to the writing of the
secret new Rockefeller Constitution. The idea to eliminate the right
of trial by jury, which the "NEW CONSTITUTION" does, came from Burger.

The art of politics, as it is practiced at the national level today in
America, has been reduced to continual deception and trickery. A
perfect example is the plan which has been concocted by Nelson
Rockefeller and his long-time friend and supporter, George Meany, to
recast Rockefeller's image in a conservative mold. Imagine! This has
become necessary because it is now the Conservatives who hold the
balance of political power in America. No doubt you've noticed the
wide publicity which has been given lately to the supposedly
conservative views which are preached by Nelson Rockefeller these days
in his speeches. Never mind that his entire public career for more
than 40 years is a sordid history of well-documented but little-known
piracy against the American ship of state. Never mind that he has
always espoused, quote "fiscal integrity", and that without exception
this has been translated into higher taxes, increasing public debt,
swelling unemployment, and mushrooming welfare rolls. And, never mind
that his public career is littered with broken promises and double
crosses. He now says things which the Rockefeller-controlled news
media label "conservative" so we are to take them at face value.

But many Americans will not be taken in by Rockefeller's own
statements alone, so going along now on a parallel road as a fellow
traveler is one George Meany. Meany has lately made a great show of
not letting the longshoremen in his AFL-CIO load wheat bound for
Russia supposedly until the American consumer is protected against
inflation and whatnot. This stand has been painted in the news media
as evidence of Conservatism on his part; but now that this political
harvest has been reaped, the grain is being loaded once again and sent
on its way to Rockefeller's Mother Russia.

Just to enhance this conservative image, Meany is also throwing snide
remarks at Henry Kissinger. Kissinger has now done his job for
Rockefeller and is about to be thrown to the wolves so as to appease
the Conservatives and to fool them into thinking they are gaining
ground. Thus Meany is building a conservative, anti-Communist image as
fast as possible; and since he is not a self-serving politician, this
apparent development of a conservative streak will be taken by many as
genuine. He will therefore be in a perfect position, when the time is
ripe, to throw his arm around Nelson Rockefeller and give him his full
political support. Rockefeller will thus be transformed into an
instant Conservative, anti-Communist, anti-Soviet in the eyes of many
trusting Americans.

One of the most diabolically clever and cruel twists in this plan has
been the way in which Nelson Rockef eller through his agent George
Meany, used exiled Russian author Alexander Solzhenitsyn to further
his own political plans. Very few Americans grasped what happened, and
Solzhenitsyn himself has no inkling at all of the treachery that
surrounded his recent visit to the United States. Solzhenitsyn is a
true and great Russian patriot who has suffered terrible things at the
hands of the imperialist, Communist regime that now enslaves his
people. He would never have knowingly permitted himself to be used by
the very people who perpetually finance and sustain the Russian
Communist police state, but he did not reckon with the craftiness of
the Rockefeller Brothers. Meany said in his introduction to one of
Solzhenitsyn's speeches under AFL-CIO sponsorship that Solzhenitsyn
is, quote: "a voice that demands to be heard; a voice that will not be
denied."

The Rockefeller approach to anything they cannot suppress is to
harness it, and that is what they did to Solzhenitsyn. They harnessed
him. First, the United States Government agreed with Russia not to
accord him any official recognition before he was released. Hence the
widely-publicized snub by President Ford. Next, George Meany latched
on to him even before he came out of Russia and sewed up a commitment
from the famous Russian exile to speak under AFL-CIO auspices in the
United States. Then when he reached America, his great AFL-CIO
speaking tour consisted of only two speeches--one in Washington, D.C.,
and the other in New York City. As a result, Solzhenitsyn's actual
words, which I believe every American should hear, were heard by very
few people. But the fact that he had spoken under George Meany's
sponsorship was publicized nation-wide in the Rockefeller news media,
and this explains why the New York Times gave it broad coverage. The
net result: A few people heard the truth from Solzhenitsyn, but vast
numbers of people were deceived by all this into thinking: George
Meany deserves the Conservative label now being stuck to him by the
Rockefeller public relations machine. A more convincing lie would be
difficult to imagine.

I now turn briefly to Topic #3.

In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 3, last month, I revealed that major
revisions are in the works for up-coming war plans. These changes
stemmed from the actions of Indira Gandhi to stop the Rockefeller
take-over of India by way of their CIA. The Rockefellers want to
absorb India into their empire before proceeding to World War III, and
are therefore modifying their foreign intrigues accordingly. Their
plans I revealed some time ago for World War III--which is really to
be half a world war with America as the main battleground--have not
been abandoned altogether. They have simply been put on a back burner
while the focus shifts to India, which is the last remaining chunk of
the old British Empire that is not yet in Rockefeller hands. The
emerging build-up to war in Asia, which is now targeted to start about
March 1977 according to the Rockefeller plans, is a complex thing and
is being largely ignored by most observers right now. I plan to speak
more about it in up-coming AUDIO LETTERS, but I feel you should have
at least a thumbnail sketch now.

To begin with, the Helsinki Accord signed recently by Ford, Brezhnev,
and leaders of more than 30 other nations had only one real effect. It
formally ratified Russian conquests in Eastern Europe regardless of
all the official protestations to the contrary. That's why Soviet
Party boss Brezhnev had tears of joy in his eyes after all had signed
it. It gave Russia a secure border in Western Europe, and the ink was
hardly dry when Russian attention turned eastward to China.
Well-orchestrated attacks on Peking and the foreign policy of Chairman
Mao have appeared not only in high-level organs of the Soviet Press
but also in Soviet satellites such as East Germany, Bulgaria, and
others.

Russia fears that China might become the leader of the Third World of
developing nations, therefore Russia is trying to encircle China and
has been greatly helped in recent years by the Kissinger foreign
policy which has handed over Southeast Asia to Russia--not to China,
as some people think--and which has effectively neutralized American
influence elsewhere along the Chinese encirclement perimeter. The
encirclement threat to China, in turn, is giving impetus to the
forging of a Sino-Japanese Axis, which is forming right now.

Finally, this whole situation and its tensions are such that the
Rockefellers hope and expect to turn it to their own purposes. Through
their thorough control of Japan, an avenue is readily available to
guide events toward precipitation of the planned war against India on
schedule. This is especially so since John D. Rockefeller III, the
real ruler of Japan today, learned all about such things long ago when
he helped maneuver the Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor. Finally,
once India is attacked, Russia will enter on India's side and America
will be used as a factory to supply Russia. The Rockefellers stand to
make lots of money through their involvement on both sides as usual;
and they expect to pick up the pieces in India after the smoke clears.

And so, my friends, on and on it goes unless we stop it! More and more
people are now asking: What can I do? I plan to say more about this in
the future, but let me just give you these brief hints for now, if I
may:

First--you must inform yourself. Know what is going on so you will
know what needs to be corrected.

Second--Inform others, and never think anything is too small to do.
Talk to a friend, a neighbor, write a letter to the Editor.

Third--Put pressure on your elected officials--locally and at the
State level, as well as Congress. Call or write--again, and again, and
again, and again until they learn you mean business and cannot be
shrugged off with routine, polite, meaningless replies.

Finally--Be specific about what you want your elected officials to do
to straighten things out.

In this regard I strongly recommend that you focus your energies on
the FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL. Those who have perpetrated this fantastic
crime and cover-up are now running scared behind the scenes. The Fort
Knox affair is the one most dangerous issue for the Conspirators, who
are trying to trap us all in a DICTATORSHIP, so do all you can to help
us break it into the open so that the truth can be proven.

Until next month, then, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and God bless
each and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])